A question rises for me is that our 'Media' (Including the sowing of memes on social media) is effectively an arm of a corporately captured state. IE: Covid hype to establish an invested population of stakeholders from global interests to masking & injecting as 'protection' from hyped fear.
So is there an intent to use a predictable backlash to fears rising from a coercive biological 'experiment' to set a mass belief in a 'genetic damage' by 'Bad Actors' in Pharma et al, as the basis for a reset into 'original sin' under a new 'Church' of biotech security™?
While this may sound an extreme possibility, it aligns with a core feature of the underlying corruption of weaponised communication–best described as gaslighting - that is the insinuation or injection of guilt as a means of mind-capture and control.
This is also systemic with a 'woke' agenda set in selected victim-driven grievance given overriding priority. as a weapon of social 'restructuring', or the insane but effective 'carbon' association for environmental guilt repackaged as sacrifice of life as green 'virtue' nurtured by decades of hyping climate 'modelling' scenarios with false parameters and skewed data. But backed up with global regulatory capture at all levels of business or institutional interaction.
Very few are able or willing to remain free of the conditionings or of the social penalty assigned to anyone openly questioning such protected or securitised narratives, as the acceleration of the process of mind capture is continuous with the leverage of industrial, financial and technological agenda of market capture, to mindshare of dependency or 'captive revenue streams' as managed identities within a profiling and manipulation of psychological and emotional liabilities - principally targeting a sense of self-lack with false self-inflations such as free or cheap access to extended abilities subject always to being choked back so as to use scarcity or fear of pain of loss to milk its prey or control behaviour - all masked under plausible but false PR, such as feeding or generating 'Problem' to serve the predetermined 'solution' whereby apparent protections reveal a racket, or indeed the farming and engineering of other human beings as assets, tools or lab specimens for biotech in all its branches as a means to act out loveless fantasies of dissociative thinking over the lives and bodies of others, and of the Biome of our world.
Whether or not such an 'offer' pact or 'contract' is bought into by a mass unconsciousness doubling down in masking lie as a 'survival' split off from underlying and compounded conflicts, is our individual responsibility to resist by choosing NOT to react from emotionally triggered manipulations, but to live from a grounded reference point.
BTW - typo alert!
"although measures were taken to try to ensure no report was missed, it is inevitable that some where"
Interesting article... a grateful thank you goes out to author for writing and publishing this interesting article.
A few logical QUESTIONS:
(1) First, was there any logical consideration given to the fact that some, if not all of them, of those deceased unva((iiinated persons were labeled as being unva((iiinated per CDC's qualifying criteria asserting that if a person dies within 14 days of their injection for a one dose va((ination and/or within 14 days of their second dose for a dual dose va((iination that those injected persons are to be classified and considered as being unva((iiinated?
(2) Second, was there any logical consideration given to the fact that the world has had the Flu Va((ines for 80 years and the world still has the Flu and that many of the people who died in the past 80 years from the Flu is because those Flu deaths were caused by the Flu Va((ines?
(3) Third, was there any logical consideration given to the fact that the previous noticeable rates of unrelated CV-19 Va((ine deaths beginning in 2016 may have been an intended result of having received Flu Va((ines that caused death serving as an indicator/signal (proof) that the powers (powers that shouldn't be) have been intentionally gradually ramping up the lethality of not only the Flu Va((ines but also the lethality of the Pediatric Va((ines, and all other Va((ines and Pharmaceutical Drugs such as the lethal Remdesivir in the years leading up to the introduction of the CV-19 Va((iIInes in December 2020 in order to cover up the anticipated upcoming drastic impact of noticeably increased deaths that were expected to be caused by the CV-19 Va((iiines beginning in December 2020?
(4) Fourth, was there any logical consideration given to the fact that during the early course of the so-called (purported) 2020 CV-19 Pandemic (criminally fraudulent PLANNEDemic) that the mainstream media and the public health officials worldwide (under the control of the powers that shouldn't be) intensely promoted and highly touted the advent of the so-called CV-19 Pandemic based mostly on the many news reports of deaths arising from Italy because the powers that shouldn't be had inside-trader knowledge (foreknowledge) as to the effectiveness of designated batches of Flu Va((ines for causing autoimmune cancers, diseases, and deaths by particularly designated batches of Flu Va((ines that were administered in those areas of Italy during the fall of 2019 and winter of 2019-2020 that would inevitably cause many deaths as intended (planned) leading up to the advent of the so-called 2020 CV-19 Pandemic in order to support the subsequent massive campaign and worldwide distribution of the CV-19 Va((iiines later that same year in December 2020?
(5) Fifth, was there any logical consideration given to the fact that the foregoing items (1), (2), (3), & (4) were a direct result of perfect foresight and planning by the powers (powers that shouldn't be) in order to cover up their dastardly gen...0...cidal agenda that was designed by them to be manifested in 2020 via the intensely promoted and widely propagandized so-called 2020 CV-19 Pandemic in order to deceive and induce the masses into a frantic state of FEAR so that the masses would voluntarily beg for and line up to receive the potentially injurious and lethally poisonous injections that were to become known as the CV-19 mRNA Va((ines?
In the interest of learning vital lessons from history and its past gen...0...cidal holocaust crimes against humanity by utilizing common sense, critical thinking, and logical reasoning... the foregoing questions are just a few logical considerations and questions occurring...
Thank you for your logical consideration for questioning the mainstream eugenicist narrative (depopulation agenda) of the powers that shouldn't be.
Abundant blessings in happiness, health, life, love, and peace to all peaceful people who are seeking the true truth...
It's possible that the flu jab was implicated in the apparent rise seen in 2016, however as far as I'm aware, there doesn't appear to be any seasonal pattern, and that jab is only given in winter (at least, as far as I know). But irrespective of that, it does appear to be a preexisting phenomenon which is in part, what this piece was trying to draw attention to. Some take the view that its 'always happened', but I'm not sure that's right either.
Given other observations made, there's good reason to think that a certain 'environmental pollutant' is the root cause of the problem.
1.) Safe & effective – that's one interpretation, but I wouldn't necessarily say that.
2.) "All cause mortality increased sharply in all countries which vaccinated heavily" – in the UK (and US), this doesn't appear to be the case. The 'sharp increase' came before the vaccine was rolled out (in the UK, mortality figures for 2022 so far are higher than 2019, but lower than 2020). I haven't looked at other countries in detail as of yet.
3.) "Are you saying that athletes are not dying in larger number than before, but regular people do?" – no, just that it would appear there was an existing upwards trend that predates the rollout.
4.) "Who funded this analysis, OP? Is it peer reviewed?" – are you referring to this article? If so, it's not funded by anyone.
I haven't researched the US statistics, but if they showed no increase in excess mortality, they are forged.
There is no way the other countries die off after the clog shots but the US populace is immune to it.
Everyone knows already how corrupt and criminally inept are CDC and FDA. So I don't trust anything that comes out of their mouth, including the 'statistics'.
Super solid analysis Seb that I hope people will read factually as is presented. Integrity of data is everything. Well done.
Well done.
A question rises for me is that our 'Media' (Including the sowing of memes on social media) is effectively an arm of a corporately captured state. IE: Covid hype to establish an invested population of stakeholders from global interests to masking & injecting as 'protection' from hyped fear.
So is there an intent to use a predictable backlash to fears rising from a coercive biological 'experiment' to set a mass belief in a 'genetic damage' by 'Bad Actors' in Pharma et al, as the basis for a reset into 'original sin' under a new 'Church' of biotech security™?
While this may sound an extreme possibility, it aligns with a core feature of the underlying corruption of weaponised communication–best described as gaslighting - that is the insinuation or injection of guilt as a means of mind-capture and control.
This is also systemic with a 'woke' agenda set in selected victim-driven grievance given overriding priority. as a weapon of social 'restructuring', or the insane but effective 'carbon' association for environmental guilt repackaged as sacrifice of life as green 'virtue' nurtured by decades of hyping climate 'modelling' scenarios with false parameters and skewed data. But backed up with global regulatory capture at all levels of business or institutional interaction.
Very few are able or willing to remain free of the conditionings or of the social penalty assigned to anyone openly questioning such protected or securitised narratives, as the acceleration of the process of mind capture is continuous with the leverage of industrial, financial and technological agenda of market capture, to mindshare of dependency or 'captive revenue streams' as managed identities within a profiling and manipulation of psychological and emotional liabilities - principally targeting a sense of self-lack with false self-inflations such as free or cheap access to extended abilities subject always to being choked back so as to use scarcity or fear of pain of loss to milk its prey or control behaviour - all masked under plausible but false PR, such as feeding or generating 'Problem' to serve the predetermined 'solution' whereby apparent protections reveal a racket, or indeed the farming and engineering of other human beings as assets, tools or lab specimens for biotech in all its branches as a means to act out loveless fantasies of dissociative thinking over the lives and bodies of others, and of the Biome of our world.
Whether or not such an 'offer' pact or 'contract' is bought into by a mass unconsciousness doubling down in masking lie as a 'survival' split off from underlying and compounded conflicts, is our individual responsibility to resist by choosing NOT to react from emotionally triggered manipulations, but to live from a grounded reference point.
BTW - typo alert!
"although measures were taken to try to ensure no report was missed, it is inevitable that some where"
should be 'were'
;-)
Brilliant piece. Thank you!
Brilliantly presented and I certainly prefer not to think its the jabs
Thank you Del!
Really interesting & well put together piece - thank you.
Thank you Karen!
Interesting article... a grateful thank you goes out to author for writing and publishing this interesting article.
A few logical QUESTIONS:
(1) First, was there any logical consideration given to the fact that some, if not all of them, of those deceased unva((iiinated persons were labeled as being unva((iiinated per CDC's qualifying criteria asserting that if a person dies within 14 days of their injection for a one dose va((ination and/or within 14 days of their second dose for a dual dose va((iination that those injected persons are to be classified and considered as being unva((iiinated?
(2) Second, was there any logical consideration given to the fact that the world has had the Flu Va((ines for 80 years and the world still has the Flu and that many of the people who died in the past 80 years from the Flu is because those Flu deaths were caused by the Flu Va((ines?
(3) Third, was there any logical consideration given to the fact that the previous noticeable rates of unrelated CV-19 Va((ine deaths beginning in 2016 may have been an intended result of having received Flu Va((ines that caused death serving as an indicator/signal (proof) that the powers (powers that shouldn't be) have been intentionally gradually ramping up the lethality of not only the Flu Va((ines but also the lethality of the Pediatric Va((ines, and all other Va((ines and Pharmaceutical Drugs such as the lethal Remdesivir in the years leading up to the introduction of the CV-19 Va((iIInes in December 2020 in order to cover up the anticipated upcoming drastic impact of noticeably increased deaths that were expected to be caused by the CV-19 Va((iiines beginning in December 2020?
(4) Fourth, was there any logical consideration given to the fact that during the early course of the so-called (purported) 2020 CV-19 Pandemic (criminally fraudulent PLANNEDemic) that the mainstream media and the public health officials worldwide (under the control of the powers that shouldn't be) intensely promoted and highly touted the advent of the so-called CV-19 Pandemic based mostly on the many news reports of deaths arising from Italy because the powers that shouldn't be had inside-trader knowledge (foreknowledge) as to the effectiveness of designated batches of Flu Va((ines for causing autoimmune cancers, diseases, and deaths by particularly designated batches of Flu Va((ines that were administered in those areas of Italy during the fall of 2019 and winter of 2019-2020 that would inevitably cause many deaths as intended (planned) leading up to the advent of the so-called 2020 CV-19 Pandemic in order to support the subsequent massive campaign and worldwide distribution of the CV-19 Va((iiines later that same year in December 2020?
(5) Fifth, was there any logical consideration given to the fact that the foregoing items (1), (2), (3), & (4) were a direct result of perfect foresight and planning by the powers (powers that shouldn't be) in order to cover up their dastardly gen...0...cidal agenda that was designed by them to be manifested in 2020 via the intensely promoted and widely propagandized so-called 2020 CV-19 Pandemic in order to deceive and induce the masses into a frantic state of FEAR so that the masses would voluntarily beg for and line up to receive the potentially injurious and lethally poisonous injections that were to become known as the CV-19 mRNA Va((ines?
In the interest of learning vital lessons from history and its past gen...0...cidal holocaust crimes against humanity by utilizing common sense, critical thinking, and logical reasoning... the foregoing questions are just a few logical considerations and questions occurring...
Thank you for your logical consideration for questioning the mainstream eugenicist narrative (depopulation agenda) of the powers that shouldn't be.
Abundant blessings in happiness, health, life, love, and peace to all peaceful people who are seeking the true truth...
Hi Jo - thank you for your comment.
It's possible that the flu jab was implicated in the apparent rise seen in 2016, however as far as I'm aware, there doesn't appear to be any seasonal pattern, and that jab is only given in winter (at least, as far as I know). But irrespective of that, it does appear to be a preexisting phenomenon which is in part, what this piece was trying to draw attention to. Some take the view that its 'always happened', but I'm not sure that's right either.
Given other observations made, there's good reason to think that a certain 'environmental pollutant' is the root cause of the problem.
Your work seems to suggest that COVID 'vaccines' are safe and effective.
However, all cause mortality increased sharply in all countries which vaccinated heavily.
So the myth of 'safe and effective' is busted, and people's experience in real life confirm that.
Are you saying that athletes are not dying in larger number than before, but regular people do?
I find that hard to believe. In fact, most scientific studies are weak, some downright fraudulent. Depending on who funded the study, I suppose.
Who funded this analysis, OP? Is it peer reviewed?
1.) Safe & effective – that's one interpretation, but I wouldn't necessarily say that.
2.) "All cause mortality increased sharply in all countries which vaccinated heavily" – in the UK (and US), this doesn't appear to be the case. The 'sharp increase' came before the vaccine was rolled out (in the UK, mortality figures for 2022 so far are higher than 2019, but lower than 2020). I haven't looked at other countries in detail as of yet.
3.) "Are you saying that athletes are not dying in larger number than before, but regular people do?" – no, just that it would appear there was an existing upwards trend that predates the rollout.
4.) "Who funded this analysis, OP? Is it peer reviewed?" – are you referring to this article? If so, it's not funded by anyone.
2)
In the UK:
https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/government-figures-confirm-male-teen?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
I haven't researched the US statistics, but if they showed no increase in excess mortality, they are forged.
There is no way the other countries die off after the clog shots but the US populace is immune to it.
Everyone knows already how corrupt and criminally inept are CDC and FDA. So I don't trust anything that comes out of their mouth, including the 'statistics'.