Yeah, he has seen it for what it is. Even worse, now we know that this "a sizable fraction of our genome is comprised of human endogenous retroviral sequences" is complete and utter non sense, and in fact a sizable fraction of our genome is comprised of exosomes, that is the truth of the matter.
And yes, majority of research are fraudulent, no control experiments ever to be seen, of course, because if they were made, it would be understood the own process by which a supposed discovery was made was what actually created it, not a happen stance in the real world.
Thank you – I'm not sure I would agree that there is 'no such thing as a virus' – the particles appear to exist, it's more a question of what they actually are / do.
But anyway, that's besides the point; this extract from Mullis' book is shared more because of what it says about the way 'science' seems to operate in some cases. It's not a discussion on what 'viruses' are, or whether or not they exist.
Yeah, he has seen it for what it is. Even worse, now we know that this "a sizable fraction of our genome is comprised of human endogenous retroviral sequences" is complete and utter non sense, and in fact a sizable fraction of our genome is comprised of exosomes, that is the truth of the matter.
And yes, majority of research are fraudulent, no control experiments ever to be seen, of course, because if they were made, it would be understood the own process by which a supposed discovery was made was what actually created it, not a happen stance in the real world.
Wow! Thank you so much for putting this together. It’s remarkable
You're welcome! Glad you enjoyed it.
Thank you, I didn’t know he was such a character!! And so spot on
I suggest you study the latest findings of Dr Tom Cowan. There is no such thing as a virus.
Thank you – I'm not sure I would agree that there is 'no such thing as a virus' – the particles appear to exist, it's more a question of what they actually are / do.
But anyway, that's besides the point; this extract from Mullis' book is shared more because of what it says about the way 'science' seems to operate in some cases. It's not a discussion on what 'viruses' are, or whether or not they exist.
It sounds like you are not aware that the existence of "viruses" or "retroviruses" have never been proven. Check out www.ViroLIEgy.com for details.
Thank you – I am, this is an extract from Mullis' book.