This is a GREAT article. Clarified so much for me. Wish I could get others to read it and digest the facts it contains. Unfortunately, people seems to be comfortable with and cling to their delusions.
What an excellent work! Thank you. I have no med.science background whatsoever and not claiming to understand everything here but it sure has informed me in the intricacies of the wider picture.
Thank you Marta! Glad you found it useful / interesting. If there are any specific parts you found confusing or couldn't easily understand, let me know and where possible I will attempt to make them clearer. The goal is to make it as clear and easy to understand as possible, so any feedback is always gratefully received. Have a nice day.
I didnt quite get the bit about Cleoquinol causing the disease, and then in the next sentence you say Cleoquinol didnt cause the disease. What does that mean ? It sounds like the SMON epidemic happened after the toxic mercury spill in the ocean around Japan.
Hello Mark – that's right. Clioquinol is used to treat abdominal problems. Its mode of action is that of a chelator, which suggests that it is used to help people who are experiencing problems because they are intoxicated.
Specifically, it is a copper chelator, and the symptoms of SMON are very similar, if not, identical to those of 'copper deficiency'. The problem here appears to be one whereby these people were already experiencing some issues of 'copper deficiency' (as we've seen in other articles, these 'deficiencies' can be caused by the fact other metals / metalloids diminish the absorption and / or use by binding with metals that are necessary to the proper functioning of the body).
It may be linked to the Minimata bay disaster. There are a number of other similar events that occurred around that time, that could also be linked. It could also be a combination of all of them. The point really is; CQL can't possibly have been the primary source of the problem, because we need to be asking; why were people taking the drug in the first place? CQL may have contributed to the problem, for the aforementioned reasons (if it is a copper chelator, it may exacerbate an existing problem), but it clearly isn't the primary driver.
Thanks Sebastien. Clioquinol sounds like nasty stuff, which must be why it is now banned in multiple countries. It was being overprescribed and overdosed in Japan. which is why they decided that it was the cause of that SMON epidemic, and any viruses present were just co-infections.
Pheromones are an example of exosomes. Exosomes are a form of inter-body and between body communication - but a surface marker match is needed for gene upload to occur.
Exosomes are being studied for therapy purposes. They can deliver helpful info to a targeted type of cell by the surface markers. But early days, not well understood.
I think it has something to do with decomposition. We with the endocannabinoid system have a built in decomposition mechanism that involves anandamide, so our ending may be blissful, and it starts some breakdown steps.
I was unaware exosomes could exit the body and 'travel' outside of it.
This could explain the 'shedding' which has been reported so often by people who got unwell by even being in the same room as people who had had the covid injectible products.
Dr. Noveen Sayed also discussed a paper which had shown Spike protein to be present in exosomes.
Hi Sebastien I was discussing the existence of the AIDS virus with a friend, after listening to Sam Baileys talk about it. People regularly do blood tests for AIDS infection, so how can they get a result if there is nothing to test for ? Is the test a fake, or is Dr Bailey wrong ? What do you think ? I noticed that compared to measles infection, the AIDS virus doesnt seem to have an acute phase, and is very slow acting.
I read Peter Duesberg's book "Inventing AIDS" that was interesting and explored an alternative hypothesis of AIDS.
Antibody tests according to Dr. Bailey, are "meaningless" and possibly non specific in my understanding of what she is saying. I really don't know. I have known people who have an HIV diagnosis who believe they acquired it from sexual contact though and have indeed had health problems even prior to staring medicine. Some of the newer pharma drugs have helped them in measurable ways. Though the challenges to virus existence as infectious and disease causing particles is definitely well founded and compelling, I cannot ignore anecdotal evidence of possible contagion.
I would definitely avoid blood contact with persons who had a positive HIV test, like I wouldn't want a blood transfusion with the presence of those antibodies just in case. So I'm still not convinced of toxic exposure alone as being disease causing or that there cannot be contagion in certain circumstances.
Back to your question you pose. Dr. Bailey has said she does not know what causes disease but that the science does not support contagion or the existence of viruses as pathogens. I think she may be right about the science but wrong that HIV antibodies are non specific or not an indicator of possible disease. I think anecdotal evidence regarding HIV is also compelling.
**when I say right about the science, I mean that there is legitimate criticism about Koch's postulates not being met in some studies, particularly with HIV. I think viral particles are grown rather than "isolated". Many virologists state that it is impossible to truly isolate these particles which makes sense due to the size and that they don't exist in isolation from other living tissues. But I do think that viral vectors can be synthesized in the lab and or grown/propagated and shown to increase in number that suggests that this type of particle can exist in nature. Peter Duesberg made the point about HIV failing Koch's postulates. I disagree with his opinion on Polio.
The book Dissolving Illusions by Suzanne Humphries has good data to support disease decline related to improving sanitation and nutrition and decreasing stressful living conditions. Also how toxic exposure to DDT may have been at play. She does not say viruses don't exist, but provides a compelling argument about the failure of vaccines to stop diseases.
So in short, I agree with Bailey's criticism of HIV studies in the lab, in vitro experiments etc. But disagree that it is purely toxins, stress, nutrition alone. We just don't know enough about the body and biochemical processes to say it's only toxins or it's only a virus. In fact, there are people who have HIV antibodies who don't get sick. They are called "long term non progressors" and their unique biochemical profile (genetic and or terrain) keeps them healthy. This is certainly not everyone who tests positive for HIV. In fact many people do become ill over time and do have a measurable improvement from newer less toxic anti retroviral drugs. At least the ones who I have spoken to.
What would Freddie Mercury say about that ? I think if you ask people who have been badly affected by AIDS, they would say it was an infection they caught. Long term infections like syphilis and AIDS follow a pattern of takeover, unless one finds good treatment. Toxic exposure is not good, but Dr Bailey claimed that one could get toxic exposure from a mosquito bite. I am sure that you could not get enough toxin of even mercury. Mercury is the most toxic thing by mass that you are likely to encounter, and it is well established how much is needed to get sick. So a mosquito bite can infect you with tiny amounts of virus, but not transmit enough toxin of any kind to make one sick. So Dr. Baileys argument doesnt hold water, and she wont discuss it with me. Also, I caught Lyme infection from a tick bite, and that is a spirochete bacteria big enough to clearly see under a microscope. It is very hard to blood test for its presence, but it behaves much like a virus, and is a longterm infection like AIDS, but it is a big bacteria that is easy to see, unlike a virus. If you got a mosquito bite, and than got a virus infection like Malaria, you might be more convinced.
I think the theory was that AZT worsened the disease. But I have known people who have HIV and spoken to some in my work (heterosexual females/non drug users) who report contracting it and their health history really doesn't point to anything else obvious.
But it's good to listen to other theories. Peter Duesberg who was a well respected virologist has an interesting hypothesis. Not that I agree with his hypothesis that it's toxic exposure alone (nitrates, drugs, malnutrition, etc.) but makes me think that their could be other contributing factors.
I've had plenty of bacterial infections and appeared to have caught or contracted illnesses so my own experience gives me pause to throw out the idea of pathogens as contributory to disease.
I also think that antibodies are measuring something and that an immune system exists. Regarding government tyranny around diseases, I think the issue is about control rather than mechanism of disease. So I don't understand why there is such a divide in people who hold different opinions about the latter.
Many thanks for your post. Good to see the truth being put out. I used to think disease was contagious until 2020 when I saw a comment on YouTube saying there were no such things as contagious diseases. I was surprised to say the least but I retained the memory.
Once the Covid 19 nonsense kicked off and I was one furlough I had turned my thing around 180 degrees. On June 1st 2020 I found a website talking about exosomes. I then realised the whole virology theory was a lie, a complete fraud. All so-called viral diseases for man or beast were falsely diagnosed and were mass poisonings using your term.
I was very angry and set up my website to explain what was going on.
For what its worth, I attach my link on vaccines and the 'flu. I also extract my exosome page link.
This is a GREAT article. Clarified so much for me. Wish I could get others to read it and digest the facts it contains. Unfortunately, people seems to be comfortable with and cling to their delusions.
Thank you! That's great to hear. In case it's useful, some of the contents are discussed in a presentation / video format here: https://sebastienpowell.substack.com/p/revising-germ-theory-presentation (might be easier to digest for those who are new to all of this).
Thank you. A wonderful read.
Thank you Greg, glad you enjoyed it!
love the pictures, and very comprehensive
🙏🏽
Thank you Jo, glad you enjoyed it 😊
Great read! Would you be interested in connecting with a Dutch publisher with the same interests? Not sure how to reach you otherwise!
Thank you Sanne – yes sure thing, you can email me at sebastienpowell@protonmail.com.
What an excellent work! Thank you. I have no med.science background whatsoever and not claiming to understand everything here but it sure has informed me in the intricacies of the wider picture.
Thank you Marta! Glad you found it useful / interesting. If there are any specific parts you found confusing or couldn't easily understand, let me know and where possible I will attempt to make them clearer. The goal is to make it as clear and easy to understand as possible, so any feedback is always gratefully received. Have a nice day.
I didnt quite get the bit about Cleoquinol causing the disease, and then in the next sentence you say Cleoquinol didnt cause the disease. What does that mean ? It sounds like the SMON epidemic happened after the toxic mercury spill in the ocean around Japan.
Hello Mark – that's right. Clioquinol is used to treat abdominal problems. Its mode of action is that of a chelator, which suggests that it is used to help people who are experiencing problems because they are intoxicated.
Specifically, it is a copper chelator, and the symptoms of SMON are very similar, if not, identical to those of 'copper deficiency'. The problem here appears to be one whereby these people were already experiencing some issues of 'copper deficiency' (as we've seen in other articles, these 'deficiencies' can be caused by the fact other metals / metalloids diminish the absorption and / or use by binding with metals that are necessary to the proper functioning of the body).
It may be linked to the Minimata bay disaster. There are a number of other similar events that occurred around that time, that could also be linked. It could also be a combination of all of them. The point really is; CQL can't possibly have been the primary source of the problem, because we need to be asking; why were people taking the drug in the first place? CQL may have contributed to the problem, for the aforementioned reasons (if it is a copper chelator, it may exacerbate an existing problem), but it clearly isn't the primary driver.
Hope that makes sense!
Thanks Sebastien. Clioquinol sounds like nasty stuff, which must be why it is now banned in multiple countries. It was being overprescribed and overdosed in Japan. which is why they decided that it was the cause of that SMON epidemic, and any viruses present were just co-infections.
Pheromones are an example of exosomes. Exosomes are a form of inter-body and between body communication - but a surface marker match is needed for gene upload to occur.
I wrote about it in my placebo/nocebo series https://www.peace-is-happy.org/post/exosomes-pheromones-and-the-placebo-or-nocebo-effect
Exosomes are being studied for therapy purposes. They can deliver helpful info to a targeted type of cell by the surface markers. But early days, not well understood.
I think it has something to do with decomposition. We with the endocannabinoid system have a built in decomposition mechanism that involves anandamide, so our ending may be blissful, and it starts some breakdown steps.
I was unaware exosomes could exit the body and 'travel' outside of it.
This could explain the 'shedding' which has been reported so often by people who got unwell by even being in the same room as people who had had the covid injectible products.
Dr. Noveen Sayed also discussed a paper which had shown Spike protein to be present in exosomes.
By design probably. Exosome passive spread has been created in research "for wild animal populations" to cause sterility in unwanted species.
Hi Sebastien I was discussing the existence of the AIDS virus with a friend, after listening to Sam Baileys talk about it. People regularly do blood tests for AIDS infection, so how can they get a result if there is nothing to test for ? Is the test a fake, or is Dr Bailey wrong ? What do you think ? I noticed that compared to measles infection, the AIDS virus doesnt seem to have an acute phase, and is very slow acting.
I read Peter Duesberg's book "Inventing AIDS" that was interesting and explored an alternative hypothesis of AIDS.
Antibody tests according to Dr. Bailey, are "meaningless" and possibly non specific in my understanding of what she is saying. I really don't know. I have known people who have an HIV diagnosis who believe they acquired it from sexual contact though and have indeed had health problems even prior to staring medicine. Some of the newer pharma drugs have helped them in measurable ways. Though the challenges to virus existence as infectious and disease causing particles is definitely well founded and compelling, I cannot ignore anecdotal evidence of possible contagion.
I would definitely avoid blood contact with persons who had a positive HIV test, like I wouldn't want a blood transfusion with the presence of those antibodies just in case. So I'm still not convinced of toxic exposure alone as being disease causing or that there cannot be contagion in certain circumstances.
Back to your question you pose. Dr. Bailey has said she does not know what causes disease but that the science does not support contagion or the existence of viruses as pathogens. I think she may be right about the science but wrong that HIV antibodies are non specific or not an indicator of possible disease. I think anecdotal evidence regarding HIV is also compelling.
**when I say right about the science, I mean that there is legitimate criticism about Koch's postulates not being met in some studies, particularly with HIV. I think viral particles are grown rather than "isolated". Many virologists state that it is impossible to truly isolate these particles which makes sense due to the size and that they don't exist in isolation from other living tissues. But I do think that viral vectors can be synthesized in the lab and or grown/propagated and shown to increase in number that suggests that this type of particle can exist in nature. Peter Duesberg made the point about HIV failing Koch's postulates. I disagree with his opinion on Polio.
The book Dissolving Illusions by Suzanne Humphries has good data to support disease decline related to improving sanitation and nutrition and decreasing stressful living conditions. Also how toxic exposure to DDT may have been at play. She does not say viruses don't exist, but provides a compelling argument about the failure of vaccines to stop diseases.
So in short, I agree with Bailey's criticism of HIV studies in the lab, in vitro experiments etc. But disagree that it is purely toxins, stress, nutrition alone. We just don't know enough about the body and biochemical processes to say it's only toxins or it's only a virus. In fact, there are people who have HIV antibodies who don't get sick. They are called "long term non progressors" and their unique biochemical profile (genetic and or terrain) keeps them healthy. This is certainly not everyone who tests positive for HIV. In fact many people do become ill over time and do have a measurable improvement from newer less toxic anti retroviral drugs. At least the ones who I have spoken to.
What would Freddie Mercury say about that ? I think if you ask people who have been badly affected by AIDS, they would say it was an infection they caught. Long term infections like syphilis and AIDS follow a pattern of takeover, unless one finds good treatment. Toxic exposure is not good, but Dr Bailey claimed that one could get toxic exposure from a mosquito bite. I am sure that you could not get enough toxin of even mercury. Mercury is the most toxic thing by mass that you are likely to encounter, and it is well established how much is needed to get sick. So a mosquito bite can infect you with tiny amounts of virus, but not transmit enough toxin of any kind to make one sick. So Dr. Baileys argument doesnt hold water, and she wont discuss it with me. Also, I caught Lyme infection from a tick bite, and that is a spirochete bacteria big enough to clearly see under a microscope. It is very hard to blood test for its presence, but it behaves much like a virus, and is a longterm infection like AIDS, but it is a big bacteria that is easy to see, unlike a virus. If you got a mosquito bite, and than got a virus infection like Malaria, you might be more convinced.
I think the theory was that AZT worsened the disease. But I have known people who have HIV and spoken to some in my work (heterosexual females/non drug users) who report contracting it and their health history really doesn't point to anything else obvious.
But it's good to listen to other theories. Peter Duesberg who was a well respected virologist has an interesting hypothesis. Not that I agree with his hypothesis that it's toxic exposure alone (nitrates, drugs, malnutrition, etc.) but makes me think that their could be other contributing factors.
I've had plenty of bacterial infections and appeared to have caught or contracted illnesses so my own experience gives me pause to throw out the idea of pathogens as contributory to disease.
I also think that antibodies are measuring something and that an immune system exists. Regarding government tyranny around diseases, I think the issue is about control rather than mechanism of disease. So I don't understand why there is such a divide in people who hold different opinions about the latter.
Hello from the UK
Many thanks for your post. Good to see the truth being put out. I used to think disease was contagious until 2020 when I saw a comment on YouTube saying there were no such things as contagious diseases. I was surprised to say the least but I retained the memory.
Once the Covid 19 nonsense kicked off and I was one furlough I had turned my thing around 180 degrees. On June 1st 2020 I found a website talking about exosomes. I then realised the whole virology theory was a lie, a complete fraud. All so-called viral diseases for man or beast were falsely diagnosed and were mass poisonings using your term.
I was very angry and set up my website to explain what was going on.
For what its worth, I attach my link on vaccines and the 'flu. I also extract my exosome page link.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/e-is-for-exosomes/
Kind regards