Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dors's avatar

I'm very thankful for your public posts and investigations.

(i) AFAICS, there was one and only one typo in the article:

> We have received a number of reports from people carrying our hair / fur analysis on themselves and their pets, that show high levels of arsenic.

‘our’ should be ‘out’

(ii) The spirit of the second half of the article, under the heading The unseen war, is at odds with my way of thinking. Thankfully, te latter is not a stuff of genius, and it is well-represented in the following texts:

* Underground History of American Education by John Gatto, in "8. Author’s note"

* https://expressiveegg.org/2021/10/05/goodbye-marx/

* https://expressiveegg.org/2021/12/29/the-technological-system/

* the bibliography at the bottom of the second link

Oh, and we all know The Machine Stops by EM Forster.

.

Expand full comment
Binra's avatar

You ask what causes co-morbidities - ie sickness - and assign it - I think - to arsenic - maybe sprayed arsenic?

I have no wish to exclude your suspect from the list of toxic suspects but still hold that true cause is not in the world itself. In other words I don't believe the materialist reversal - though I have been raised to its way of thinking and seeing.

Seneff can give you a humongous ream of research to show glyphosate's multiple toxic pathways of harm. And over the years I have given a lot of attention to a lot of researchers following their pet suspects and feeding pet theories - and increasingly sense we each and together make the life we then live out according to the word (definitions) we give. This isn't within the realm of applying logic to existing or accepted assumptions, but calls for questioning root assumptions.

I sense this will be made easier as our 'identity/worldview' breaks down regardless doubling down in what used to work before.

Can you disprove your theory?

Or is it seeking status of a protected narrative because it holds promis of 'saving lives'.

(I'm calling attention to a pattern that can be recognised regradless of what 'side' anyone takes or takes identity against).

Before the spiking agenda I joined in warning or illuminating lack of reason to fix up with whatever your batch lottery lined up, and every reason to not do so.

But as soon as people had clearly taken the bait, I spoke to the miracle of the body of life rather than nocebo or lay a curse on the already weakened and suggestible. (As I suspect the sudden death meme is intended to effect). A Godless sense of life, world and nature casts all as threat and victim to then have that experience. Why do some succumb to poisons and others not?

You can postulate an immune system - back to Mithiditis - but this is all set in magical thinking that interjects between the life and the Source of life like a moneylender in the temple.

In the light of a stated goal for convergent governing structures of Biosecurity state, Green New Deal, and centralised technocratic controls set locally under global regulations (ESGs) I suggest that those who effectively control global credit/money and other vectors of control are intent of using or generating any and every means to support their goals, while encouraging every kind of disinformation to divert and divide so as to deny true function to gain for weaponised fiction - such as "The Science".

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts